Convert the existing 'significant results' track into one named landmark paper or open-weights release this year — moves the scarcity signal from 'under-ten at lab X' to 'under-ten globally', the difference between a 92 and a 94 OVR.
Add a public-facing surface (a technical blog, talk circuit at NeurIPS/ICLR keynote tier) — current visibility is industry-known; thought-leader visibility roughly doubles transfer-fee leverage for researchers at this level.
Use the global-mobility option: a competing frontier lab will pay a 2-3x make-whole on unvested equity right now, so a single discreet conversation re-anchors market_value upward without changing the job.
Think this score is wrong?
Prove it. Calculate your own and share the result.